четверг, 3 сентября 2020 г.

Fighting for His Views Ron Paul 2012 Research Paper

Battling for His Views Ron Paul 2012 - Research Paper Example Another facilitated that remark by saying: â€Å"There are not many individuals in open life who, through various challenges, no matter what, adhere to their standards. Ron Paul is one of those few.† (About Ron Paul No pg) Ron Paul has consistently maintained the constitution and he accepts that Americans must face the unforgiving real factors of the world. He accepted that we have to handle our issues utilizing the standards of our progenitors which structure the premise on which our incredible country was assembled (Potter No pg). Pittsburgh was the origin of Ron Paul and he was raised there too. He grew up to turn into an obstetrician/gynecologist with in excess of 4000 conveyances added to his repertoire. Besides, Ron wedded Carol Wells in 1957 and has been with her since. He is fathering five kids with her. He has been dynamic in legislative issues for right around 50 years now and his perspectives and beliefs have not faltered an inch over these years. He is predictable, reliable and genuine and he is one of the most acclaimed Presidential contender for the appointment of 2012(Potter No pg). Paul has confidence in the respectability of the Constitution and that is the reason he so fervently contradicts any demonstration that infringes on the opportunity and protection of American individuals. This is an invigorating difference in pace for Americans who so far have just seen legislators who talk about regarding the constitution however totally overlook it when it doesn't accommodate their plan. Ron Paul may not be as cleaned as different up-and-comers yet he gets a kick out of the chance to keep it genuine and this has been the explanation behind him acclaim. He says what he truly has faith in his heart and no measure of inspiration can get him to change his convictions. One of his adherents summarizes it best when she says: â€Å"What Ron Paul began isn't going to disappear. Republicans are amidst choosing what the GOP truly is. He’s the ju st one remaining on standards. Also, those standards will outlast Ron Paul.† (Potter No pg) Ron Paul’s contemplations and convictions emerge from the wide scope of encounters he has had over his long and vivid life. During the 1960’s, he worked for the Air Force of the United States as a Flight Surgeon. During his long and celebrated vocation as an obstetrician/gynecologist; he not even once wanted to play out a fetus removal, not even to spare a woman’s life. He generally found another way. This demonstrated his solid conviction to maintain the sacredness of life. As a President, he will keep on battling for his ace life convictions that he has maintained in Congress consistently (Ron Paul on the Issues No pg). America is light a very long time behind the remainder of the world with regards to medicinal services. Our civil servants keep on compelling upon us their one-size-fits-all arrangements that will never bring down expenses or increment access for t he basic American. Paul plans on changing all that once he becomes President. As indicated by Paul, the best system for guaranteeing better clinical consideration is to guarantee a successful specialist quiet relationship. Ron Paul will put medicinal services choices again into the public’s hands. He vows to expel superfluous enactment, degenerate orders, and neglectful motivations and make a framework where everybody can get the important human services (Ron Paul on the Issues No pg). Ron Paul is similarly as tired of the rising financial disquietude as the remainder of Americans. He is against the developing expansion, higher gas costs, gigantic spending deficiencies and totally unethical bailouts

пятница, 28 августа 2020 г.

Middle Ages to the Enlightenment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Medieval times to the Enlightenment - Essay Example Practically whole Europe had been Christianized as the eleventh century arrived at its end. The High Medieval Era is called as medieval society’s blooming in light of the scholarly renaissance that occurred in the twelfth century since thinkers like Thomas Aquinas and Pierre Abelard just as in view of the foundation of numerous colleges and information focuses in Oxford, Bologna, and Paris (Snell, 2014). The absolute most brilliant stone palace structures and houses of prayer found in Europe to date were worked in this period. What is known as feudalism in the current age got built up in numerous pieces of Europe including Britain? Different ventures and fields that prospered included yet were not constrained to creation and exchange of the extravagance merchandise, and yields. Europe had arrived at the apogee of social wealth and economy toward the finish of the thirteenth century but on the other hand was going to see its downturn. The medieval world changed into the early p resent day world before the finish of the Middle Ages. Some destructive occasions of the fourteenth century are the Black Death, the Italian Renaissance, and the Avignon Papacy. Shakespeare writing thrived during the sixteenth century and the seventeenth century saw the Great Fire of London. Organization portrayed the high medieval society. Another respect developed for the individual’s esteem with the planting of the seeds of human rights in the general public. Numerous critical changes occurred as far as the advancement of information from the Middle Ages through the Age of Enlightenment till the nineteenth century. The Age of Enlightenment began in Europe and spread to the provinces in America. The Age of Enlightenment restricted narrow mindedness and strange notion notwithstanding contradicting instances of intensity maltreatment by the congregation and the state. The historical backdrop of information is obviously considered to have arrived at a development period in the scholarly trade consequently causing a logical upheaval.

суббота, 22 августа 2020 г.

“Freakonomics” by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner Essay

Freakonomics, by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, is book that not your average financial specialist would compose it was co-wrote in 2005 and on the off chance that profound quality speaks to how we might want the world to work, at that point financial aspects speak to how it really accomplishes work in this honor winning book. Steven D. Levitt is a not your run of the mill financial specialist. He is a much-proclaimed researcher who examines the enigmas of regular day to day existence from cheating and wrongdoing to sports and kid raising and whose ends turn the customary way of thinking on its head (freakonomics.com). Stephen J. Dubner is an honor winning creator and writer (freakonomics.com). These two creators collaborate to make an extremely clever earth shattering cooperation. They set out to investigate the inward activities of a break pack, reality with regards to realtors, the insider facts of the Ku Klux Klan, and significantly more. Through much narrating and sagacious information, they show that financial matters is at the root, the investigation of motivating forces (freakonomics.com). There isn't one hidden subject the book, Freakonomics, is worked around, however there are numerous reoccurring topics all through. The three significant topics that I discovered happen all through the book are: certain versus regulating examination, motivating forces are the foundation of present day life, and the possibility of â€Å"tournament† style markets, â€Å"winner take all†. Freakonomics is a splendid, provocative examination concerning intentions: what are they, how they can be changed, and how they influence what individuals do. It is likewise a misleadingly simple perused: its style is entertaining and truly holds the peruser all through the book. Freakonomics handles a portion of our most fundamental presumptions about the way individuals, and society, work. I accept that Freakonomics exhibits the fundamental monetary standards. I will shield this contention through the fundamental topics of Freakonomics. Positive versus standardizing investigation is one of the numerous fundamental topics of Freakonomics. The ends got from every section will regularly amaze the peruser. These ends may likewise not concur with your own convictions, yet that is the premise of positive versus standardizing investigation. Positive financial matters is target and actuality bases, while standardizing financial matters is emotional andâ value based. Positive financial investigation articulations don't generally need to be valid, however so as to be viewed as a positive examination you should have the option to verify or negate the announcement. Standardizing examinations are assessment based, so they can't be demonstrated or refuted. This fundamental financial standard isn't in every case straightforward in light of the fact that the customer is generally very worth based. Open arrangements are commonly spun around standardizing financial explanations meaning the differences carry on the grounds that neith er one of the sides can demonstrate that is right or inaccurate. There are numerous instances of positive versus regulating examination all through Freakonomics, in part four, on wrongdoing and fetus removal, the creators delivered the issue of how crime percentages identify with premature birth and supported it up with the factual data. This is a case of positive investigation in light of the fact that the factual data bolsters the issue being contended. Regularizing examination of the issue among wrongdoing and premature birth would be that they are not associated to each other in light of the fact that it promises the devotion to thoughts of the manner in which the world ought to be. Additionally, in section five, the coauthors accept that a child’s scholastic achievement doesn't originate from parental endeavors and they clarified this through the information introduced in the book. One would figure a parental figure would help a child’s improvement in the study hall, yet in all actuality its other outside components that does. T his plainly outlines the distinction between an investigative methodology that thinks about the world, all things considered (positive examination) and a systematic methodology that depends on how the world ought to be (regulating examination). Motivating forces are the foundation for current life, individuals react to impetuses. A comprehension of motivating forces is the way to unmistakably seeing any human conduct. Motivators are a thing that rouses or urges one to accomplish something. Motivating forces are wherever on the planet particularly in financial aspects. Organizations are frequently given expense motivating forces for recruiting more workers. Motivating forces are an installment or admission to invigorate more noteworthy yield or venture. In Freakonomics, Levitt and Dubner accept motivating forces identical to the investigation of financial matters. In section one, Dubner and Levitt shout that motivations come in three assortments: moral motivators, social impetuses, and monetary motivating forces. Moral motivations are which one carries on of still, small voice or conviction. Social motivators are by which actionsâ are identified with disgrace or magnificence. Monetary motivators are making individuals act in their very own budgetary intrigue. In section one, we saw the case of a day care focus in Haifa, Israel, in which a fine was collected for guardians getting their youngster late from day care. When the fine was actualized, we began seeing guardians appearing late in light of the fact that it permitted increasingly close to home spare time. When this monetary motivating force was demanded guardians found that the extra time exceeded the financial motivator. Guardians were just getting their kid on time in light of the fact that there was to some degree a motivating force socially and ethically. They ethically or socially accepted they needed to get their youngster on schedule, yet since a financial motivation was actualized they didn't feel ethically mindful to be on schedule and simply paid the fine. Additionally in section one, we saw the motivator for educators and their understudies to excel on government sanctioned testing for mor e school financing or even to keep their activity, so instructors carry on nonsensically and assist understudies with undermining normalizing testing. Motivating forces are found in regular daily existence they are in each circumstance relying upon one’s individual convictions, which additionally can relate back to regulating versus positive investigation. In section two, realtors don’t have moral impetus to get the best cost for their clients house being sold. Getting the ideal cost on a house and tedious. Since realtors cause 3 to 6% commission on houses they to have minimal motivator to place more work in then required for a modest quantity of cash more. They feel their time is progressively significant at that point investing more energy in selling a house realizing they can sell it quicker at a less expensive cost. There are numerous models all through the book of motivating forces, however the one I discovered most intriguing was the issue of street pharmacists despite everything living at home in part three. Levitt and Dubner use managing rocks for instance of a motivator to better yourself and bring in cash through brutal workplaces, yet it is likewise a case of an essential monetary standard called â€Å"tournament type markets†. They deliberately utilize the case of managing rocks as a â€Å"tournament† type advertise by persuading the peruser this is a â€Å"winner take all† field of work. Road level medication sales rep generally are spurred by getting advanced in the medication business, so they eventually attempt to boost the gang’s benefits. Higher ranker authorities anyway are progressively keen on bringing in cash since they are now in a place of high status. In general in this market there are numerous players, butâ one by one they are killed. Toward the end, a victor develops and brings home the â€Å"prize† or cash. As expressed in the book, the main 120 â€Å"managers† operating at a profit devotees posse spoke to simply 2.2 percent of the undeniable group participation, yet brought home well the greater part the cash. This is a â€Å"tournament† style advertise on the grounds that these â€Å"managers† rose up out of the various contenders and are currently high positioning, they won the â€Å"tournament† fundamentally. By and large I trust Freakonomics shows fundamental financial standards. Levitt and Dubner spread out numerous basic topics in the book, Freakonomics, yet there are numerous reoccurring subjects all through. The three significant subjects that I found all through the book are: certain versus standardizing examination, motivations are the foundation of current life, and the possibility of â€Å"tournament† style markets, â€Å"winner take all†. These three fundamental financial standards are only a couple of the significant subjects in the book, however I accept are sufficient proof to persuaded the peruser that Freakonomics covers major monetary standards and is a book of financial aspects. Taking all things together, Freakonomics is a splendid book that consolidates ordinary thoughts into financial ones. It really is a book about financial matters and the proof given demonstrates this. Works Cited â€Å"Freakonomics.† Freakonomics RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 June 2014. Levitt, Steven D., and Stephen J. Dubner. Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything. New York: William Morrow, 2005. Print.

Racial Stereotypes in the Media

Racial Stereotypes in the Media A generalization might be characterized as a prevalent view about explicit social/ethnic gatherings or kinds of people and it is comprehensively normalized or streamlined originations of gatherings dependent on some earlier presumptions. The generalizations in some cases can have negative or positive effects on people. We can see numerous customary generalizations, for example, Stereotypes of Irish individuals, Hispanics, Native Americans, Asians, Native Americans or African Americans in the event that we test through the American history. We make the generalizations when we are reluctant or unfit to get the entirety of the data about the individuals or circumstances on the off chance that we have to make a judgment about them. In any case, the generalizations that we made honestly to simply fill in the spaces in our psyches about the data we are absence of, lead a sort of crooked race segregation. As indicated by these generalizations, all Asians appears virtuoso as every single Iri sh individuals appears to be hotheaded brawlers; All white individuals appear kind of racists as every African American appear to be servile and crude animals. In feeling of making these generalizations, the media has assumed a pivotal job to validate them. In the start of 1920s, the TV coming out similarly as a shilly-shallying gadget, it has been of an issue monetarily, strategically, socially and morally for society in following years. The idea of generalization has started to lead the pack the subject of bigotry. With respect to the idea of prejudice, has been raised by certain ideas, for example, white individual and the others. Broad communications has been one of the fundamental gadgets in the manner white Americans see African-Americans. African-American individuals has been depicted and satirized in cliché and they have been spoken to in defaming ways, for example, uninformed, upbeat, languid, offbeat, buffoonish and melodic till the finish of 1980s. That decade was the br illiant age for dramas and TV shows like Dallas, Dynasty, Falcon Crest, and Knots Landing and the hit arrangement like The Cosby Show, Cheers, and Family Tie. The references in these TV shows were generally about the way of life, customer society, local issues and ethnicity in those years. Besides, the Cosby Show can be expected as an achievement in the prejudice arrangement of American history inside its trademark esteems. The method of reflecting customary African-American generalizations has been truly astonishing for the crowds. In this paper, I will look at the utilization of conventional generalizations in feeling of prejudice in the Cosby Show circulated somewhere in the range of 1984 and 1992. The media depicts numerous flawed generalizations about different races and these generalizations who are individuals from specific gatherings with which we have not had firsthand contact are reflected in a chagrining path all in all. The media branches, for example, the TV, books, funny cartoons, and motion pictures are for the most part rich wellsprings of generalized characters. By generalizing the individuals or some ethnic gatherings, we sort of imprint the individuals with specific attributes. For quite a bit of American history, The US media centers in around explicit races and contrarily speaks to them. Along these lines, this circumstance sustains the racial generalizations in American culture. It is honestly appears that some specific ethnic gatherings who have not white skin - African Americans specifically are for the most part reflected as being less clever, increasingly revolting, and more brutal than the Caucasian residents when we experience the American history. The white individuals have appeared to have more benefits that the other ethnic gatherings. Moreover, this circumstance kinfolk of transforms into a 'disguised prejudice.' The dark individuals have felt this inadequacy in the public eye as the white individuals have begun to feel that the dark individuals are second rate contrasted with them in course of time. Ruth Frâ °nkenberg (1996) makes reference to about someexamples in her examination.  She likewise makes reference to that she got a more awful or poor assistance when she went out in the open places, for example, bistros when she was with different companions who has white skin. The foundations of whiteness idea go back to time of colonization. This idea has ascended in Britain a the British individuals thought the Ã'â‚ ¬e㠐⠾ã'â‚ ¬le à Ã¢ ¾f the Middle E⠰ã'†¢t as others. Edwâ °rd à Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢ °id (1978) shows that there were two various types of individuals in the public arena as the Orient who is white and kind and the other people who are not Westerners and socialized. In procedure of time, the idea of others w⠰ã'†¢ Ã'⠁â °rried t㠐â ¾ N㠐â ¾rth à Ã¢ meriã'⠁â ° and it is moved to the Native an African Americans. In media, these others are appeared as the dangers for white individuals till the finish of 1980s. Indeed, even in the kid's shows, it tends to be honestly observed that a large number of the dark characters with minority voices are not demonstrated to be as savvy as the more white characters. These generalizations have made the idea of bias in American culture against the dark individuals. When all is said in done feeling of conventional generalizing, the predominant culture comprises of white working class as African-Americans are unreasonably and ridiculously depicted as brutal, furious, unfriendly and criminally disapproved. This distortion of African Americans turned into the regular picture on TV till the finish of 1980s. The new media was not demonstrating the truth in social sense as it appeared open door for equivalent portrayal and correspondence between the races. The adverse picture of African American individuals which was created by these generalizations was propagated in some TV shows, for example, the Amos and Andy Show. This TV show started as a radio show including two white men depicting two comedic dark men. This TV show appeared between 1920s a 1950s just because and it turned out to be exceptionally well known that time. In course of time, some elective TV shows, for example, the Cosby Show have ascended against the dark inadequacy. The Cosby Show appeared in a period the dark individuals looking for their own jobs and characters in American culture. In the show, there was Huxtable family that comprises of Cliff and Clair Huxtable, and their five kids: Rudy, Vanessa, Denise, Theo, and Sondra. The dad was specialist as the mother was legal counselor. This family was an upper-working class Black family. This TV show was another picture of African American families introduced and it was not acknowledged completely in light of the fact that it neglected to speak to the full social extent of African Americans as per the numerous individuals. Another pattern appeared with the Cosby Show despite the fact that it was not completely acknowledged and African American families began to will in general watch programs with essentially African American throws. The media has an extraordinary capacity to impact the social orders and the people in TV shows are acknowledged as genuine characters in genuine world. The American culture has tended to acknowledge the bogus pictures as reality and the pictures distorting African Americans has effectsly affected American culture till the Cosby Show.

пятница, 21 августа 2020 г.

Re-word the future free essay sample

Faking a grin to veil my indecision, I moved toward a kid sitting alone in the stuffed cafeteria. I never collaborated with an impaired individual and I didn’t comprehend what's in store. Before my lips could frame a welcome Mikey interposed, â€Å"Hi! I can’t hold on to mess around with my new buddy.† Stunned by his lucid welcome, he annihilated my cliché desire for the simple-minded. Anxious to banter, Mikey’s untainted interest uncovered a connecting with discourse; be that as it may, as we entered the passage our discussion reduced. With each progression, his trepidation heightened. The gregarious kid I met twenty minutes prior disappeared. Timidly going after my hand, I unpretentiously disregarded his signal in dread of submitting social self destruction. Before I could scrutinize his adjustment in character I perceived the reason for his backlash. Coldhearted inner circles of gossipers yelled foreboding remarks that reverberated through the corridor s, â€Å"Who’s the impeded child? Did you lose a bet?† I can’t state this was a revelation, however it was a transformative second. We will compose a custom article test on Re-word what's to come or on the other hand any comparative theme explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page I pondered its awkward usage and deriding impacts. Immovably grasping Mikey’s hand we explored through a multitude of understudies oblivious to the intensity of their own words. Retard, a defilement of the word impeded, is an excruciating generalization constrained upon the simple-minded. These six letters plague those engaging scholarly incapacities. Said with the goal to affront, hinder taunts an impeded individual’s want to be acknowledged in the public eye. They are prodded in light of the fact that they can’t grasp at a pace society esteems fit, yet ridiculers overlook the tirelessness the intellectually impeded apply to achieve straightforward moves that most make for allowed. Society misshapes the harmless definition into a derisive remark that infers unimportance. Thusly of deriding a friend’s idiocy is detest discourse. While trying to legitimize their numbness, many feel the intellectually disabled are unequipped for unraveling nefarious remarks against them. This people neglects to understand that the impaired are more indistinguishable than various. They chuckle similarly as boisterous, dream similarly as large and grin similarly as brilliant as all of us; subsequently, their agony is similarly as genuine. Racial slurs and one-sided affronts have passionate effects; â€Å"retarded† is the same. Mikey’s antisocial retreat exhibits that even magnetic people can be scared by belittling remarks. Millions overall culpably use this wording ordinary. TV have, Chelsea Handler, expands this dangerous discourse week after week when an expected 900,000 watchers check out her program. Previous White House Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, added to this dehumanization by calling adversaries of â€Å"Obama-care† â€Å"retards†. Dehumanizing language has the ability to trash those with intellectual and formative handicaps. It is of central significance that the mark hinder is annihilated from the word reference j ust as our personalities. The slow-witted are something other than a word; they are a piece of our locale. Society has made incredible walks in wiping out numerous types of loathe discourse; for Mikey’s purpose the time has come to spread another â€Å"r-word†: regard. We will most likely be unable to re-compose the past, yet we can re-word what's to come.

Land Law UK Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Land Law UK - Assignment Example This will guarantee that there will be no gathering in the understanding that goes to a misfortune. Under the law, the bank as the mortgagee would practice the accompanying cures against the borrowers here alluded to as the mortgager. The mortgager while proceeding with their reimbursements for the property claims title over the property, however: the mortgagee is qualified for the accompanying rights identifying with the title of the mortgager. One of such is the option to make flawless the title where on the off chance that the mortgagee is the second mortgagee after the first, he purchases the main mortgagee and thus turns into the first. Furthermore, the mortgager has the option to improve the property as a portrayal for the security for the advance yet such consumption are required to be sensible contrasted and the sum acquired so reimbursement isn't hampered (Stroud, 2013). What's more, it is regularly the request for the day that the mortgager gets back the substance of the home endless supply of the home loan. Along these lines, in the event that the mortgagee makes more use than is sensible, at that point the mortgagee isn't qualifies for guarantee repayments for the cash spent. This is as on account of South well v Roberts (1940) 63 CLR 581. If the mortgager doesn't meet the commitment to reimburse as for our situation; at that point the bank has two significant cures. To start with, this is the privilege of the bank to practice the intensity of offer as specified in the home loan archive just as the resolutions. Besides, the mortgagee has the cure of dispossession as expressed in segment 100 of the Conveyancing Act. Under the old framework, abandonment must be affected by court request while dispossession under the Torrens framework, it is necessitated that an application is made to the enlistment center general to make a request for dispossession under segment 61 of the law. In case of home loan defaulting all home loans, have the force

четверг, 11 июня 2020 г.

The cultural belief of hegemonic masculinity essay

What is hegemonic masculinity? Hegemonic masculinity makes men as superior human and sees women as submissive and weak objects that should live according as the man says. According to the male dominance, they always should subordinate and contribute the womens position because women are not so great, perfect and brave as men. The theory of hegemonic masculinity was reviewed by many sociologists and scientists during all periods. Hegemony is a total winning and holding of power over other social groups. Masculinity sets men as the highest class of society and maintains their domination over women. Men are considered to have hegemonic masculinity if they exhibit the features of traditional masculinity. There is a certain set of qualities that a man should have, such as power, dominance, heterosexuality, leadership, rationality, control of their emotions. The traditional masculinity harms gender equality and sets men higher and much more important than women. Masculinity definition by various sociologists If to trace back to the Middle Ages, the philosopher Aristotle from Greece assumed that masculinity is equal to the rationality and strength of men, when women are marked by such things as emotions, sexuality and their bodies. The Australian sociologist R.W. Connell says that masculinity doesnt exist as an unchanged and single form. Connell presumes that a man of the modern society shouldnt have the qualities that considered masculine. She also insists that homosexuality is also a form of masculinity, despite on those facts that a lot of people define homosexuality as the opposite thing to the masculinity. Thanks to the Connells theory, people could study the history of masculinity. Her work showed that masculinity is a concept that can change. David Iacuone in his book â€Å"Real Men and Tough Guys† (2005) views masculinity as a blueprint that defines the real mans behavior and describes qualities he must have. According to Iacuone, hegemonic masculinity defines women as an object, gives them mostly domestic duties and notes their value for men only as sexual objects. But some men groups try to avoid hegemonic masculine culture, mostly when they want to improve their women welfare and try to change the traditional relations where patriarchy is dominating. Sociologists Michael S. Kimmel and Amy Aronson (2008) made a pattern of a real man; they defined him as a young, heterosexual, white, married, urban, with college education, employed, and with defined weight and height. They assumed that any man who doesnt fit this pattern, should be defined as unworthy. Ross Haenfler (2006) defines advantages and disadvantages of masculinity. He says this concept has got good benefits to set men higher than women but in the same way they should pay price for this with shorter life, lack of emotions in relationship and poor health. Haenfler noticed that men who lose control over relationship and work, become strict in self-control. They start to control thoroughly their sexual appetites, personal lives, and fitness because of the crisis, and as a result, try to avoid womens influence. According to Haenfler theory, since late 19th century, the base of masculinity was broken and modern men dont understand how to be a man. The traditional male role of breadwinner was destabilized a lot and taken by women, and apart from this, feminists make a challenge to men with changing gender inequality. Other critics and scientists who made researches on hegemonic masculinity says that the definition of this concept do not reflect the actual life of men, so the entire theory gives an imprecise report about male identities in society. Due to increasing and development of industrialization in our world, hegemonic masculinity started to lose its real meaning in modern society. Nowadays, a lot of women take leadership positions at work and assume the main role of breadwinners because a lot of young men try to avoid responsibilities that are dictated by masculinity. In our society women work as hard as men, and there are no differences between genders in this sense. Earlier women should mostly listen to their men, sit at home, raise children. Modern world totally changed this view with active position of feminization that lead to the current situation when gender is equal.